Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 23959

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : September | Volume : 17 | Issue : 9 | Page : EC06 - EC10 Full Version

Immunohistochemical Expression of p16 and p53 as Prognostic Indicator in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: September 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64769.18408
Neeti Sindhwani, Vishal Sharma, Nitu Singh, Beenu Singh, Kavita Sahai, Bhu-shan Asthana, Ankur Ahuja, Gaurav PS Gahlot

1. Former Resident, Department of Laboratory Sciences and Mol Med, Army Hospital (R and R), New Delhi, India. 2. Associate Professor and Head, Department of Skin and VD, Command Hospital (WC), Chandimandir, Panchkula, Haryana, India. 3. Assistant Professor and Head, Department of ENT, Command Hospital (SC), Pune, Maharashtra, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of ENT, Command Hospital (SC), Pune, Maharashtra, India. 5. Professor and Consultant, O/o DGAFMS, New Delhi, India. 6. Consultant and Head, Department of Lab Sciences, Command Hospital (SC), Pune, Maharashtra, India. 7. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 8. Professor, Department of Laboratory Sciences, Command Hospital (SC), Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Gaurav PS Gahlot,
Professor, Department of Lab Sciences, Command Hospital (SC), Pune-411040, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: gpsinghgahlot@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common cancer globally and the seventh most common cause of cancer-related mortality. Tobacco use, alcohol consumption, and Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection are prominent risk factors for HNSCC. HPV-positive Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) differs from HPV-negative OSCC in terms of risk factors, preferential site of origin, age, histomorphological features, molecular genetic alterations, and prognosis. The prominent basaloid morphology and lobular growth of OSCCs are associated with p16 positivity and p53 negativity, respectively.

Aim: To establish the immunohistochemical expression of p16 (p16INK4a) and p53 in OSCC and to assess their relationship with specific histomorphological features, in the form of solid growth of cells in a lobular configuration, small crowded cells with scant cytoplasm, dark hyperchromatic nuclei without nucleoli.

Materials and Methods: The cross-sectional study involved fifty cases of OSCC over a two-year period from January 2017 to January 2019 at Army Hospital (R and R) Delhi Cantt. The intensity of p16 and p53 protein expression was graded as follows: no staining (0), weak staining (1), moderate staining (2), and strong staining (3). The proportion/percentage of staining for p16 and p53 protein expression was calculated as follows: 1-4% (1), 5-19% (2), 20-39% (3), 40-59% (4), 60-79% (5), and 80-100% (6) cells stained. A quick score of 0-1 (negative), 2-3 (weak positive), 4-5 (moderate positive), and >6 (strong positive) was assessed. Cross tables were generated and the Chi-square test was used for testing associations. The Statistical Software for Data Science (STATA)-14 was used for statistical analysis.

Results: A total of 50 cases of OSCC were analysed for histomorphological features and immunohistochemical patterns of p16 and p53. The age distribution showed that 8 (16%), 9 (18%), 18 (36%), 13 (26%), and 2 (4%) of the patients were in the age groups of 31-40 years, 41-50 years, 51-60 years, 61-70 years, and above 70 years, respectively. The gender distribution noted 42 (84%) males and 8 (16%) females. Genital and non-genital mucosa are usually involved by HPV subtypes 6, 11, 16, 18, and 16, 18, 11, 13, 2, respectively. HPV-16 has been demonstrated in 90-95% of all HPV-positive HNSCC cases, followed by HPV-18, HPV-31, and HPV-33. p53 is considered the guardian of the genome and controls the expression and activity of proteins involved in cell cycle regulation, DNA repair, cellular senescence, and apoptosis. More than 50% of all primary HNSCC exhibit p53 mutation.

Conclusion: A significant correlation was observed between age, dysplasia, keratinisation, basaloid morphology versus p16 expression, and lobular growth, histological grade versus p53. An inverse relationship between p16 and p53 expressions was observed. The immunohistochemical expression of p16 as an immunohistochemical marker of HPV, along with p53, is recommended. Due to the constraint of the study period, the survival of the patients could not be assessed in correlation with p16 and p53 expression.

Keywords

Basaloid pattern, Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, Immunohistochemistry, Lobular growth

The HNSCC is extremely heterogeneous and the sixth most common cancer worldwide with variable clinical presentations, and it is the seventh most common cause of cancer-induced mortality (1),(2),(3). According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) accounts for more than 90% of malignant tumours of the oral cavity and oropharynx (4).

The p53 is considered the guardian of the genome and controls the expression and activity of proteins involved in cell cycle regulation, Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid (DNA) repair, cellular senescence, and apoptosis (5). Recently, there has been an increasing trend of OSCC in young age, less tobacco and alcohol consumption, with more poorly differentiated histopathology. However, such cases usually respond to conventional radiotherapy treatment and have better survival, as reported by Gupta S et al., (6),(7),(8),(9). This study aims to establish the immunohistochemical expression of p16 (p16INK4a) along with p53 in OSCC and assess their relationship with specific histomorphological features.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study comprised fifty cases of OSCC conducted from January 2017 to January 2019 at Army Hospital (R&R) Delhi Cantt, New Delhi, India after taking Ethics Committee Approval from the institute (IEC: AHRR/PG/Pathology/NS 2017).

Procedure

Detailed relevant clinical data for the study was collected from the data register of the “Department of Pathology”. Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained slides of the respective patients were reassessed for histopathological parameters, including tumour type and grade according to Broder’s criteria, and are depicted as follows: Well -Differentiated Squamous Cell Carcinoma (WDSCC)- (Table/Fig 1)a-d, Moderately Differentiated Squamous Cell Carcinoma (MDSCC)- (Table/Fig 2)a-d, Poorly Differentiated Squamous Cell Carcinoma (PDSCC)- (Table/Fig 3)a-d, and Basaloid SCC- (Table/Fig 4)a-d (4). All newly diagnosed/recurrent cases of OSCC were included, while cases with inadequate specimens/post-radiotherapy were excluded. Depth of invasion was categorised as T1 (<5 mm), T2 (5-10 mm), and T3 (>10 mm), respectively, and measured using the microscope scale on representative slides.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using p16 and p53 antibodies: p16 (Mouse monoclonal antibody; Thermo Fischer; Immunogen: Purified recombinant fragment of p16 expressed in Escherichia coli (E.coli); Clone: 5A8A4; Isotype: Mouse/IgG1) and p53 (Mouse monoclonal antibody; Thermo Fischer; Immunogen: Recombinant human wild type p53 protein expressed in E.coli; Clone: DO-7; Isotype: IgG2b). IHC involves the binding of the primary antibody to specific tissue antigens, followed by interaction with a biotinylated secondary antibody (5),(6). The streptavidin/Horse Radish Peroxide (HRP) complex is then applied, with streptavidin attaching to the biotin on the secondary antibody and HRP acting as the indicator enzyme. Upon addition of a DAB chromogen, a coloured precipitate develops at the tissue antigen sites. Positive controls of p16 (cervical carcinoma) and p53 (human colon adenocarcinoma), as well as negative controls (tumour section without any antibody), were processed with every batch to determine the correctness of the procedure. Nuclear and cytoplasmic staining of p16 and nuclear staining of p53 were considered positive (Table/Fig 5)a-i for p16 and (Table/Fig 6)a-i for p53. The intensity of p16 and p53 protein expression was graded as follows:

• No staining (0),
• Weak staining (1),
• Moderate staining (2),
• Strong staining (3) (7).

The proportion/percentage of staining for p16 and p53 protein expressions were calculated as follows:

• 1-4% (1),
• 5-19% (2),
• 20-39% (3),
• 40-59% (4),
• 60-79% (5),
• 80-100% (6) of cells stained (8).

IHC results were further evaluated using a semi-quantitative Quick-score, obtained by multiplying the intensity with the percentage of tumour cells expressing the protein [9,10]. A quick score of 0-1 (negative), 2-3 (weak positive), 4-5 (moderate positive), and >6 (strong positive) was assigned. The parameters studied included age, gender, dysplasia of the lining epithelium, histological grades of SCC, basaloid morphology, lobular growth pattern, depth of invasion, intensity of permeating lymphocytes, and lymphovascular/perineural invasion.

Statistical Analysis

Quantitative data are expressed as means and standard deviation, while ordinal/categorical data are expressed as absolute numbers and percentages. Cross tables were generated, and the Chi-square test was used to test associations. STATA-14 was used for statistical analysis. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The histomorphological features and immunohistochemical patterns for p16 and p53 were analysed in 50 cases of OSCC. The age distribution showed that 8 (16%), 9 (18%), 18 (36%), 13 (26%), and 2 (4%) of the patients were in the age groups of 31-40 years, 41-50 years, 51-60 years, 61-70 years, and above 70 years, respectively, with a mean age of 54.72±11.80 years and a median age of 55.5 years. The study comprises of 42 (84%) males and 8 (16%) females.

The distribution of various parameters of the patients, including the histomorphological features, has been mentioned in (Table/Fig 7). The comparison of various histological grades of OSCC with the four patterns (negative, weak, moderate, and strong) of p16 and p53 expression respectively has been mentioned [Table/Fig-8,9]. There was a significant statistical difference in the distribution of histological grades with the four patterns of p16 expression (p-value 0.014) and p53 expression (p-value=0.029). A statistically significant association between p16 and p53 with the histological grade of MDSCC (p-value of 0.036) was observed. However, no significant statistical association between p16 and p53 for the histological grades of WDSCC (p-value of 0.908) and PDSCC (p-value of 0.358) was noted.

A statistically significant negative correlation was observed between age and histological grade (r=-0.298, p=0.036), between dysplasia and p16 (r=-0.499, p<0.001), has been observed (Table/Fig 10). However, positive correlation was observed between dysplasia and p53 (r=0.425, p=0.002). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between lobular growth and p16 (r=0.543, p<0.001), and a negative correlation was observed between lobular growth and p53 (r=-0.481, p<0.001). A significant positive correlation was found between keratinisation and histological grade (r=0.443, p=0.001), and negative correlations were observed between keratinisation and p16 (r=-0.395, p<0.001) as well as p53 (r=-0.290, p=0.041). There was a significant positive correlation between prominent basaloid morphology and p16 (r=0.543, p<0.001), and negative correlations were observed between prominent basaloid morphology and p53 (r=-0.481, p<0.001) and p53 (r=-0.290, p<0.001). The respective correlation coefficient values are mentioned in (Table/Fig 10).

Discussion

Oropharyngeal cancers are the most common cancers worldwide, accounting for nearly 40% of all malignancies in India and South East Asian countries, primarily due to the habit of chewing tobacco and areca nut (pan/gutka) among the population (8). The divergence in epidemiologic trends among OSCCs arising from different anatomic subsites represents its heterogeneity (1). The index study included 50 fresh and retrospective cases of OSCCs treated at a tertiary care hospital of the Armed Forces in Northern India over a two-year period from January 2017 to January 2019. The age range of the patients was 31-86 years, with 84% of the cases occurring in the 41-80 years age group, which is similar to the findings observed by Shinohara S et al., (11). The mean age of the patients in the present study was 54.7±11.80 years, which concurs with a corresponding value of 51.28±12.14 reported by Hashmi AA et al., (7).

In the present study, 84% of the cases were males and 16% were females. The higher proportion of males can be attributed to the study being conducted in a tertiary care hospital of the Armed Forces. The reasons for the relative protection observed among females remain unknown but may be associated with anatomical, reproductive, or hormonal factors (11).

Non-traditional, behavioural, and environmental risk factors, including having multiple sexual partners and a history of oral-genital/oral-anal sex, have been evolved to the etiology of oropharyngeal cancers (6),(7),(10),(12). Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a causative agent of head and neck cancer, similar to its role in genital cancers, owing to similarities in the epithelia. The prevalence of HPV in normal oral mucosa ranges from 0.6% to 81% (5),(6),(12). Different HPV subtypes, such as 6, 11, 16, 18, and 13, are involved in genital and non-genital mucosa. HPV-16 has been demonstrated in 90-95% of all HPV-positive HNSCC cases, followed by HPV-18, HPV-31, and HPV-33. Kulkarni SS et al., observed that 96% of cervical and 70.59% of OSCC cases were positive for HPV, respectively (12). Variable central keratinisation and horn pearl formation were noted, depending on the tumour differentiation of the tumour as per Broder’s classification (13). Sarwath H et al., studied the immunoexpression of p16 and p53 proteins as biomarkers of oral carcinogenesis and their correlation with histomorphological parameters (5),(6),(7),(8).

The present study includes 14 (28%) well-differentiated OSCC, 27 (54%) MDSCC, and 9 (18%) PDSCC cases. Basaloid SCC, described by Wain SL et al., is characterised by a follicular or lobular pattern of invasion with peripheral, elongated palisade cells surrounding each lobule (14). The characteristic histopathological features of the basaloid component of the tumour include: (a) solid growth of cells in a lobular configuration closely opposed to the surface mucosa; (b) small crowded cells with scant cytoplasm; (c) dark hyperchromatic nuclei without nucleoli; and (d) small cystic spaces containing material resembling mucin that stains with periodic acid-Schiff or Alcian blue (14).

The present study reveals 19 (38%) p16-positive cases (inclusive of all grades) and 31 (62%) p16-negative cases. Among the 38% p16-positive cases, four cases (8%) showed weak positivity, two (4%) showed moderate positivity, and 13 (26%) showed strong positivity. Furthermore, the comparison of various histological grades of OSCCs with patterns of p16 expression exhibits strong positivity was more associated with higher grades of OSCC, in accordance with Ralli M et al., In OSCC, increased expression of p53 intensity is related to the clinical severity of the disease (9),(15),(16),(17). Worldwide, variable p53 overexpression ranging from 31% to 85.6% in HNSCC cases has been observed, as reported by Khan H et al., from India and 63.3% expression by Tandon P et al., in a Brazilian population [18-20]. In the present study, it was observed that 52% of the patients had negative p53, 24% had strong p53, 14% had moderate p53, and 10% had weak p53 expressions. The comparison of various histological grades of OSCC with the four grades (negative, weak, moderate, and strong) of p53 expression in the index study showed that five out of nine cases of PDSCC were positive for p53, 16 out of 27 cases of MDSCC were positive for p53, and only three out of 14 cases of WDSCC were positive for p53. These results are similar to those reported by Ghanghoria S et al., (21). Variable expression of p53 in OSCCs may be due to different techniques used, methods of interpretation, or differences in ethnicity and risk factors involved in OSCC pathogenesis. The present study showed strong p53 positivity in PDSCC than MDSCC, which indicates that with the increase in OSCC pathological grading, the rate of mutant p53 positivity also increases, consistent with the results of previous studies (21).

Out of the 50 cases, 41 showed dysplasia of the stratified squamous lining epithelium, with 58.5% and 33.6% of cases having positive expression for p53 and p16, respectively. This indicates that dysplasia is not associated with p16 expression. Eleven cases exhibited a pattern of lobular growth, with nine of them (81.8%) showing positive p16 expression. This observation is similar to the findings of Shinchara S et al., All eleven cases with lobular growth showed negative p53 expression, indicating an inverse relationship (11).

Among the 11 cases that showed basaloid morphology, nine cases (81.8%) showed strong p16 expression, and none had p53 expression. This strongly indicates an inverse relationship between p16 and p53 markers. This observation is in correlation with Wain SL et al., who highlighted that HPV-positive cases consistently exhibited prominent basaloid morphology (13),(14). Within the basaloid subtype, the detection of HPV is a highly favourable prognostic factor, helping to identify a subset of cancers that deviate from the highly aggressive behaviour associated with this variant.

A significant positive correlation was found between keratinisation and histological grade (r=0.443, p=0.001), and a negative correlation was observed between keratinisation and p16 (r=-0.395, p<0.001), as well as p53 (r=-0.290, p=0.041). A significant negative correlation/inverse relationship was found between p16 and p53 (r=-0.297, p=0.037). The association of p16 and p53 across the various histological grades, including MDSCC (n=27), PDSCC (n=9), and WDSCC (n=14), was assessed. It was observed that there was a statistical significance between p16 and p53 under the histological grade of MDSCC (p-value of 0.036). However, there was no significant association between p16 and p53 for the histological grades of PDSCC (p-value of 0.358) and WDSCC (p-value of 0.908). Similar findings were observed by Shinohara S et al., Ghanghoria S et al., and Ralli M et al., (15),(21).

A statistically significant difference in the distribution of histological grades versus the four patterns of p16 and p53, with an increase in their intensity corresponding to clinical severity and higher histological grades, was observed. A significant negative correlation was found between dysplasia versus p16, keratinisation versus p16, lobular growth versus p53, or vice versa.

Limitation(s)

The analysis of data from a single centre, and there is a need for validation of p16 IHC through DNA detection-based studies.

Conclusion

HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer is a unique subtype that dominates the landscape of head and neck oncology, and its increasing incidence is impacting diagnostic, preventive, and therapeutic practices. We observed a significant negative correlation between age versus histological grades, dysplasia of the lining squamous epithelium, keratinisation, versus p16 expression, and lobular growth and histological grade versus p53. A positive correlation between lobular growth and p16 expression, and keratinisation and histological grade. Furthermore, we noted an inverse relationship between the expressions of p16 versus p53. Therefore, we recommend the use of immunohistochemical expression of p16 as a surrogate marker of HPV, along with p53.

References

1.
Ausoni S, Boscolo-Rizzo P, Singh B, da Mosto MC, Spinato G, Tirelli G, et al. Targeting cellular and molecular drivers of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Current options and emerging perspectives. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016;35(3):413-26. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Sgaramella N. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue: Studies of biomarkers connected to human papillomavirus infection, epithelial to mesenchymal transition, and locoregional metastasis. Canc and Onco. 2017;1-2. https://www.diva-portal. org/smash/get/diva2:1094089/SPIKBLAD01.pdf.
3.
Gupta N, Gupta R, Acharya AK, Patti B, Goud V, Reddy S, et al. Changing trends in an oral cancer-a global scenario. Nepal J Epidemiol. 2016;6(4):613-19. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Broders AC. Carcinoma: Grading and practical application. Arch Pathol. 1956;2:376-81.
5.
Sarwath H, Bansal D, Husain NE, Mohamed M, Sultan AA, Bedri S. Introduction of p16INK4a as a surrogate biomarker for HPV in women with invasive cervical cancer in Sudan. Infectious Agents and Cancer. 2017;12:50. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Gupta S, Gupta S. Role of human papillomavirus in oral squamous cell carcinoma and oral potentially malignant disorders: A review of the literature. Indian J Dent. 2015;6(2):91-98. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Hashmi AA, Hussain ZF, Hashmi SK, Irfan M, Khan EY, Faridi N, et al. Immunohistochemical overexpression of p53 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Clinical and prognostic significance. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(1):433. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Sgaramella N, Coates PJ, Strindlund K, Loljung L, Colella G, Laurell G, et al. Expression of p16 in squamous cell carcinoma of the mobile tongue is independent of HPV infection despite presence of the HPV-receptor syndecan-1. Br J Cancer. 2015;113(2):321-26. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Gupta AK, Lee JH, Wilke WW, Quon H, Smith G, Maity A, et al. Radiation response in two HPV-infected head-and-neck cancer cell lines in comparison to a non-HPV-infected cell line and relationship to signaling through AKT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74(3):928-33. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Gatoo MA, Dar AM, Siddiqui M. Correlation of P53 expression with different histological grades in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients from northern India. J Cancer and Oncol. 2018;6(1):01-14. [crossref]
11.
Shinohara S, Kikuchi M, Tona R, Kanazawa Y, Kishimoto I, Harada H, et al. Prognostic impact of p16 and p53 expression in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014;44(3):232-40. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Kulkarni SS, Kulkarni SS, Vastrad PP, Kulkarni BB, Markande AR, Kadakol GS, et al. Prevalence and distribution of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 in carcinoma of cervix, saliva of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma and the general population in Karnataka, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(3):645-48.
13.
Huang K, Chen L, Zhang J, Wu Z, Lan L, Wang L, et al. Elevated p53 expression levels correlate with tumour progression and poor prognosis in patients exhibiting esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2014;8(4):1441-46. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Wain SL, Kier R, Wollmer RT, Bossen EH. Basaloid-squamous carcinoma of the tongue, hypopharynx, and larynx: Report of 10 cases. Hum Pathol. 1986;17(11):1158-66. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Ralli M, Singh S, Yadav SPS, Sharma N, Verma R, Sen R. Assessment and clinicopathological correlation of p16 expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Cancer Res Ther. 2016;12(1):232-37. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Patil S, Rao RS, Amrutha N, Sanketh DS. Analysis of human papillomavirus in oral squamous cell carcinoma using p16: An immunohistochemical study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2014;4(1):61-66. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Liu SZ, Zandberg DP, Schumaker LM, Papadimitriou JC, Cullen KJ. Correlation of p16 expression and HPV type with survival in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer. Oral Oncol. 2015;51(9):862-69. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Barasch S, Mohindra P, Hennrick K, Hartig GK, Harari PM, Yang DT. Assessing p16 Status of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma by combined assessment of the number of cells stained and the confluence of p16 staining: A validation by clinical outcomes. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40(9):1261-69. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Tandon P, Dadhich A, Saluja H, Bawane S, Sachdeva S. The prevalence of squamous cell carcinoma in different sites of oral cavity at our Rural Health Care Centre in Loni, Maharashtra-a retrospective 10-year study. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2017;21(2):178-83. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Khan H, Gupta S, Husain N, Misra S, Negi MPS, Naseem J, et al. Correlation between expressions of cyclin-D1, EGFR, and p53 with chemoradiation response in patients of locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. BBA Clin. 2015;21(3):11-17. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Ghanghoria S, Ghanghoria A, Shukla A. p53 expression in oral cancer: A study of 50 cases. Nep JOL. 2015;5:747-51.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64769.18408

Date of Submission: Apr 15, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Apr 28, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jul 26, 2023
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 17, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 06, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jul 21, 2023 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com